What; An Ambassador Isn’t Allowed to Like Footjob Porn?
It seems like not a day goes by without at least one famous person embarrassing himself (and let’s be honest here; it’s most often a “himself”) by liking, up-voting or otherwise drawing attention to something that will attract controversy.
This problem seems to be especially pronounced within the global population of government officials, who often seem to struggle with the notion that when they like something on Twitter, other people will know they’ve done so, too.
The latest such incident involves Liu Xiaoming, the Chinese Ambassador to the United Kingdom. Liu’s twitter account was spotted liking something that didn’t seem to have much relevance to his job, a fact that didn’t escape the attention of Liu’s critics, or the international media.
One question that doesn’t seem to have drawn much discussion from others is central to Calico’s post about Liu’s licentious like: Why do politicians bother with the excuses at this point? Don’t they all get a free pass in the age of Trump, when tweeting and retweeting completely socially unacceptable things appears to have become part of an officeholder’s job description?
What if, instead of blaming “hackers,” Liu were just to shrug it all off and tell people to mind their own business? Would the shock and outrage last more than a news cycle or two? Wouldn’t be less humiliating than having your government demand an investigation by Twitter?
Read all about it in Calico’s latest post, “What; An Ambassador Isn’t Allowed to Like Footjob Porn?”
by Calico Rudasill, Sssh.com Porn For Women
read on…
As I’ve written about before, any time a politician (or just about any other kind of public figure) coughs up a wayward like, thumbs-up or retweet, the person who owns the account typically claims something like their Twitter has been hacked, or that one of his (unidentified, naturally) staff members was operating the account at the time.
As such, it should come as no surprise to hear that when the Twitter account for Liu Xiaoming, China’s Ambassador to the United Kingdom, liked a video of a woman stimulating a man’s penis with her feet, the Chinese government called for an investigation into the incident.
Serious Investigation Demanded!! (File Under “Duly Noted, Dude.”)
“Recently, some anti-China elements viciously attacked Ambassador Liu Xiaoming’s Twitter account and employed despicable methods to deceive the public,” the Chinese Embassy in London said in a statement issued after the news broke. “The Chinese Embassy strongly condemns such abominable behavior.”
The Embassy further stated that it has reported the incident to Twitter and urged the social media platform to “make thorough investigations and handle this matter seriously.”
All I can say is I’m glad the Chinese Embassy made that request to Twitter and not to me – because handling this matter seriously is just not something I’m inclined to do.
My investigation would go something like this: Look at the video and the original tweet, snort in mild amusement, shrug and write back to the Chinese Embassy something like: “After an exhaustive and rigorous examination of the evidence, I’ve decided I just don’t give a rat’s hairy ass whether your Ambassador to the UK likes to watch women stimulate penises with their feet. Please do thank him on my behalf for the splendid blog fodder, though!”
But Does the Hammer Fear the Anvil? (And Does Either Beat Scissors?)
For his part, Liu took to Twitter to retweet the Chinese Embassy’s statement, adding a curious observation of his own: “A good anvil does not fear the hammer.”
Unfortunately, I’m not very good at deciphering cryptic analogies, so I have to ask: Who (or perhaps what) is the anvil here and who is the hammer?
Is Twitter the anvil and the Chinese government the hammer? Is the penis the anvil and the hammer is the woman’s feet? Or maybe Liu himself is the anvil and he’s trying to tell Twitter he’s not scared of penis-hammers?
Maybe Liu will clarify what he means in a future tweet. Or maybe he’ll like a video of Micky Yanai doing his “Helicopter Man” act and then blame that retweet on Ted Cruz’s anonymous staff member. (Hey, anything possible; it is still 2020, after all.)
Why Bother with the Explanation?
Here’s the other thing about this later like-controversy that I don’t get: While I can understand why people who work in certain sensitive, “family-friendly” jobs might want to distance themselves from sexually-charged tweets and posts, it’s less clear to me why anyone in the political realm still finds it necessary to do so. After all, hasn’t the President of the United States set the social media bar so damn low as to make it virtually impossible for other elected officials to not clear it?
Seriously, for an off-the-top list that is very far from being comprehensive, Trump has in the past tweeted or retweeted bogus, racially-charged crime stats, videos in which a supporter of his can be heard chanting “white power,” various anti-Muslim crap from Britain First loon Jayda Fransen and multiple things sourced from QAnon and Pizzagate bozos.
I will say this much for Trump: When people do call him out about the garbage in his Twitter feed, at least he doesn’t claim one of Melania’s mischievous pals grabbed his phone while he was away from the dinner table, blame it on an anonymous staff member, or claim it’s the work of his long-missing publicist, “John Miller” (or was it “John Baron”?).
So, why doesn’t Trump play the blame-the-hackers card so many others do when they screw up on Twitter?
That’s easy: because he doesn’t need to. Just look at what he said when he was pressed on why he shared that bogus crime stat meme: “This was a retweet, and it came from sources that weren’t very credible; what can I tell you?”
If that’s all it takes to make the story go away, why waste your time with explanations, honest or otherwise? Just toss your hands in the air and say “Whatever.” or “Sue me.”
Granted, I’m sure the Chinese government wouldn’t be too impressed with Liu saying “Hey, I like watching footjob porn; what can I tell you?” – so maybe in his case, blaming hackers really was the smart play.
Erotic Cinema For Discerning Adults
Anonymous Adult Search